In Pawlowski v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. Co., the Wisconsin Supreme Court further clarified the meaning of “harboring” as defined in Wis. Stat. Sec. 174.02. The Pawlowski Court held that “harboring” is to shelter or give refuge to a dog. The Court reasoned that the Defendant harbored the dog (despite not being its owner) because she allowed the dog to live in her home for several months and provided it with shelter and lodging. Moment-to-moment control of the dog is not required.
The Role of Evidence in Proving Your Personal Injury Case
In Wisconsin, personal injury law enables those who have been harmed or injured as a result of negligence or intentional actions of another party to seek compensation for their losses. In order to...