In Pawlowski v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. Co., the Wisconsin Supreme Court further clarified the meaning of “harboring” as defined in Wis. Stat. Sec. 174.02. The Pawlowski Court held that “harboring” is to shelter or give refuge to a dog. The Court reasoned that the Defendant harbored the dog (despite not being its owner) because she allowed the dog to live in her home for several months and provided it with shelter and lodging. Moment-to-moment control of the dog is not required.
Things to think about going through divorce in 2023
The changing of a calendar year is a time for new beginnings, whether through resolutions or taking a fresh look at life. Unfortunately, for some people, "new beginnings" may mean embarking on a...
