In Pawlowski v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. Co., the Wisconsin Supreme Court further clarified the meaning of “harboring” as defined in Wis. Stat. Sec. 174.02. The Pawlowski Court held that “harboring” is to shelter or give refuge to a dog. The Court reasoned that the Defendant harbored the dog (despite not being its owner) because she allowed the dog to live in her home for several months and provided it with shelter and lodging. Moment-to-moment control of the dog is not required.
The Role of a Guardian ad Litem in Wisconsin Divorce Cases
Raising a child is often regarded as one of the most fulfilling parts of life. You and your partner give them love, security, and anything else they need to reach their full potential. But what...
